#81, I am thoroughly disgusted with this Slayton

I do not wish to say that Vivekananda was greedy. But some events are worth discussing.

Apparently, Swami Vivekananda was an oratorial success at the World Parliament of Religions. From Nov. 1893, he was under a three year contract with Slayton Lyceum Bureau, Chicago for delivering lectures at various places.

Swami Vivekananda wrote to Mrs. Hale from Detroit on Feb. 20, 1894.

"...I am thoroughly disgusted with this Slayton* business and am trying hard to break loose. I have lost at least $5,000 by joining this man. ... "

Analysis: From Nov. 1893 to Feb. 20, 1894 about three months have elapsed. In three months Vivekananda expected to make Dollars 5,000/-. This amount seems to be very high when we view the incomes of people of those times in U.S.A. For example, Lyon County engaged an Engineer for its new Electricity generation plant @ Dollars 75/- per month and for three months it comes to Dollars 225/-. Electricity generation was new in those days, engineers would have been scarce, and they might have been paid well. If an Engineer earns $225 in three months, can a monk lecturing on Hinduism earn $ 5,000 or $20,000 per annum?

I furnish below the link for proof of $75 wage for an engineer: http://www.rootsweb.com/~ialyon/bookhist/buncombe/yrprog1.htm reads: "In May J. W. Trickey of Luverne was hired as engineer and lineman for the new system at a salary of $75 per month, and he started work at once". We can also observe from the link that the salary of the Sheriff of the County was reduced from $400 a year to $250 a year. Did Vivekananda want to earn 80 times the earning of a Sheriff of a county or about 15 times the earnings of an Energy Engineer? Even Ms. Susan B Anthony, a very popular speaker and women's rights campaigner of those days was offered $100 per lecture.

Besides, we have to take into account the promotion expenses of a lecture bureau such as Newspaper advertisements, bill boards, banners, hall-hires, refreshments, travel expenses etc. I am tempted to deduce that Vivekananda expected to receive a lion's share of ticket sales, which Slayton Lyceum Bureau might not have conceded.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I believe that the amount Vivekananda had estimated that he lost, $5000, is a reasonable one. R. G. Ingersoll used to make around $600 per lecture. Vivekananda, in many instances, drew a larger crowd than Ingersoll. He was under the Lecture Bureau contract for 4 months. If he gave 12 lectures, which I suppose he did (Madison, Minneapolis, Des Moines, Chicago, Detroit, Ada, and other places we don't even know about), he would have made around $7200. Let's say that Henry Slayton gave him only $1200 and pocketed $5000. There would be a commission for Slayton, of course, but we can't expect a monk to recall all the finer details of the contract. Vivekananda's statement was of a general nature.
August 24, 2008 at 8:49 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

239 Do the questions of beef eating - drinking and smoking by Vivekananda really matter?

Image
Ans: Yes. The questions of beef eating and alcohol consumption really matter, for "parama hamsas" (Great Swans) and UPLIFTERS-OF-NATIONS, like Swami Vivekananda. They do not matter for ordinary hoi pollois like you and me. Question: Thousands of Vivekananda devotees seem to hold a view: *Was Vivekananda not entitled to his quota of fun? *What was wrong in Vivekananda's eating beef? *What was wrong in Vivekananda's consuming alcohol? *What was wrong in Vivekananda's smoking cigars? ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర నివేదన. I shall not impose my views on you. ANSWERS: I am not here to pass any value judgements on Vivekananda's character or lifestyle. My objects here are to find out facts and examine how they differ from the generally held views of millions of Indians who worship him, reading the literature published by the Managers of his Cult. These things have now become contextually important...
Read more

108, There was nothing ... I am afraid

Image
Ms. Henrietta Muller was a major contributor to the purchase of the land for the Belur Math. On 15th May 1899, the American Newspaper Nagautuck Daily News published an item quoting a Mumbai newspaper her as saying that she is face to face with the unavoidable conclusion that it is utterly rotten and corrupt from beginning to end and full of danger to the unhappy people who place their faith in it. Ms. Henrietta Muller was a major contributor to the purchase of the land for the Belur Math. On 15th May 1899, the American Newspaper Nagautuck Daily News published an item quoting a Mumbai newspaper her as saying that she is face to face with the unavoidable conclusion that it is utterly rotten and corrupt from beginning to end and full of danger to the unhappy people who place their faith in it. In this connection, pl see review #65 by clicking the label #65 or the following link: http://vivekanandayb.blogspot.com/search/label/%23065 . The report of the Mumbai Newspaper is not trace...
Read more